~ This article was updated August 1, 2020 ~
It’s hard to believe the world we’re living in right now. Life “before” feels like an eternity ago.
And yet, many of us are continuing trying to wrap our heads around the situation… especially as things are changing so quickly across the nation. I know I for one am still vacillating back-and-forth between thinking “it’s all going to be OK!” and feeling like I’m going to burst into tears. (Maybe we all need a little pep talk….)
You probably know this by now, but just in case: coronaviruses are a family of viruses – for the most part, they affect animals, but seven of them have proved capable of infecting humans. The name coronavirus is derived from the Latin and Greek words for crown and wreath – it’s named for its appearance: the ring around the surface of the virus appears crown-like (see below). (BTW, SARS-CoV2 is the particular coronavirus circling the globe right now, and COVID-19 is technically the label for the illness this coronavirus causes in people.)
A disclaimer: This situation is still rapidly evolving and is widely varied based on geography, evidence by the stark discrepancies across the US. There is no playbook for this pandemic, friends — it’s uncharted territory for all of us… and there’s no way to predict how things are going to continue to pan out or what COVID-19 will mean for any given family.
Although we know more than we did in March, scientists and researchers still do not have a handle on the exact clinical picture for COVID-19. Increasingly, experts have been explaining that many people may be entirely asymptomatic (perhaps 40%, per the CDC), which may partly help explain how the virus spread so widely and so rapidly — people have been transmitting the virus without even knowing that they themselves are infected (although, there’s also evidence that people with fewer symptoms are less likely to spread the virus.
^^This is all part of why wearing a face mask is so important, though.
Among those infected with symptoms, illness can range from mild (similar to a common cold) to severe (namely, acute respiratory syndrome), requiring hospitalization and even leading to death. Data shows, however, that a vast majority of cases have mild symptoms.
With inadequate testing (HOW do we still have such a testing shortage??) and geographically-diverse testing protocols, we do not currently know the exact overall death rate among individuals who’ve contracted the coronavirus (though the CDC’s “best guess” currently is 0.65% across the board). But we do know it can be deadly, especially among elderly patients and individuals with underlying health conditions (called “co-morbidities”).
How Does the Coronavirus Affect Children?
Based on the evidence available — from the US and all around the world — children do not seem to be as impacted by the virus as adults — but it doesn’t mean they are immune.
It is generally accepted professional opinion at this point that children are not as impacted by COVID-19.
At this point, research has continued to reinforce the early conclusions that a vast majority of pediatric cases are asymptomatic, mild, or moderate. Indeed, data still indicates that most pediatric COVID patients suffer mild symptoms and have an “excellent prognosis.”
Current research does, however, suggest that babies (under 1 year) may be more likely to suffer “severe” or “critical” symptoms compared to older children.
Note: There have been very few confirmed pediatric deaths from COVID-19.
The coronavirus is increasingly deadly with advanced age. In China, the average age of death from the coronavirus was in the seventies (especially individuals with other health problems or smokers); in Italy, the median age of death was eighty, and by far most fatalities are among seniors.
Younger age groups are still susceptible, and younger populations can still develop serious illness that requires hospitalization.
[Note: there has been a major problem in the media, which has often relayed these statistics with the insinuation that it’s “only” old people who are affected. Even if that were true — and it’s not — it would still be a tragic and unacceptable loss of life.]
Experts aren’t 100% clear as to why children seem to be mostly dodging the bullet, but they agree that children either aren’t getting infected at the same rates as adults or else aren’t exhibiting visible symptoms. IOW, children either don’t come down with COVID-19 at the same rate, or they are way more resilient to it if they do. Or both. Either way, they could potentially still be carriers.
This debate is still unfolding, and there are proponents in both camps. The biggest question right now is what role kids play in transmission — because if we could figure out the extent to which children are capable of spreading the virus, it could potentially be huge, and drastically influence the reopening processes. The most recent opinion (based on a study from South Korea), suggests that children <10 are much less likely to spread the virus but that children 10-19 years-old may be capable of spreading the virus at the same rate as adults.
Why are Most Children Protected?
There are a few ideas floating around in regards to why children seem somewhat protected from the coronavirus. First, the most susceptible people are individuals who are already suffering from medical conditions, and children are simply more likely to be in better health compared to older adults and elders.
Another thought is simply that children’s immune systems are thriving and may have more antibodies to fight viruses compared to adults. On the flip side, it’s also possible that kids’ immune systems, since they are still revving up, don’t grossly overreact to the coronavirus — an outcome which has been observed in elderly populations. Lastly, there is also some suspicion that the binding receptors the virus attaches itself to in the respiratory tract are not as well-developed in children as in adults (and therefore the virus is less transmissible to them).
All of this said, children can still be susceptible and get sick. Kids who have compromised immune systems, congenital heart problems, respiratory conditions or metabolic problems, or who are obese, may be at a higher risk for more severe symptoms from COVID-19, if they contracted it. And as mentioned before, babies and toddlers do appear to be at a higher risk for severe illness compared to older children, possibly because their immune systems are still in “training mode,” leaving them more vulnerable to infections (babies’ immune systems tend to under-react to infections rather than risk over-responding to every foreign stimuli).
In May, isolated case reports of children exhibiting serious and rare inflammatory symptomology (at much higher rates than would be expected) — and speculation that it may be “COVID-related” — has thrown a wrench in the emerging picture.
Although these episodes are alarming, doctors are still reassuring parents to remain calm and continue to enact the same basic safety measures. “It would be a terrible mistake for parents to worry,” Dr. Jeffrey Burns told The Washington Post. “The chance for a child up to this point of becoming critically ill is very, very rare.” If you’re worried about this, I highly recommend reviewing this explanation, spearheaded by economist Emily Oster.
Nonetheless, we can all take heart in the fact that our children are at a generally lower risk for COVID-19 complications.
When swine flu (H1N1) broke out in 2009, it was a terrifying time to be pregnant. Pregnant women were especially vulnerable to this virus and died at a much higher rate.
The good news is that this doesn’t seem to be the case with COVID-19. Even months in, we are still in the learning phase… but the information we do have about how COVID-19 affects pregnant women and babies suggests that pregnant women are not necessarily at special risk.
The very quick summary is this:
- pregnant women do not seem to be at increased risk for infection or for severe illness compared to the general population;
- transmission from mothers to babies is quite uncommon (and in-utero transmission is very rare);
- and so far doctors are not documenting negative outcomes among babies to born to mothers who experienced COVID.
That said — we need more data. Especially on early pregnancy (first and second trimester).
Accumulating research has, for the most part, corroborated the pictured painted by early data out of China: that pregnant women with COVID-19 pneumonia suffered typical symptoms, and went on to have healthy babies. All-in-all, most data suggests pregnant women are not more likely to suffer severe illness from COVID-19 than the general population — one study of pregnant women in NYC even showed that nearly 88% of COVID-positive pregnant women were asymptomatic.
Furthermore, there is scant reason to believe that maternal-fetal transmission is generally occurring. I say “scant” because a recent case study did document the possibility of placental transmission (in late pregnancy). However, experts indicate that though this single case proves the possibility of maternal-fetal transmission, it’s still clearly very rare. Researchers are adamant that we need more data to better understand the possibility of vertical transmission and the effects on gestation.
The takeaway here? So far, evidence on the impact of COVID-19 in pregnancy is all relatively good news.
Note: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) explain that even though pregnant women are not evidently at a greater risk (since they have depressed immune systems and are known to be a greater risk for other respiratory viral infections), they should still be considered an “at-risk population” for COVID-19.
I can’t even imagine being pregnant right now, and our hearts go out to all of you who are trying to wade through this pandemic with heightened nerves (and more) — we’re so sorry you’re going through this right now. We have more information on what’s happening with pregnancy/labor/delivery and other relevant FAQS on our coronavirus information home page.
*There’s a lot of talk about how far along numerous vaccine development projects are, and that’s great (truly, it is — the trials are moving at lightning speed, historically speaking), and now we’re far enough into this thing that I hear a lot of people starting to look hopefully to the New Year for something to become available.
Not to be a buzzkill, but I for one am skeptical that anything will be readily available very soon, and am also mindful that even if it were, a successful vaccine still wouldn’t change things overnight. Doctors are continuing to experiment with a number of drug treatments (under compassionate use programs), as well as other possible therapies, but these processes take time.
Bottom line — coming up on the fall of 2020, the world continues to feel pretty messed up, and we’re all doing our best to adapt to a scary, fluctuating, and frustrating reality… but one thing that I am taking heart in every day is the fact that I’m not also constantly terrified for my children’s lives, because that would be truly unbearable. Hopefully this gives you too some small sense of solace.